PGP Integration in MacOS X Email Clients
- Introduction
Paranoia runs deep around the Cryptonomicon.Net editorial offices. We are forever looking over our collective shoulders for evidence of a network break-ins, drive-by wi-fi shenanigans, or torrid interoffice romances. It's not surprising then that we all use secure email software. This is no small feat when one considers the range of systems we operate on our desktops. Over half of the editorial staff use Macintoshes as their "daily drivers." Thankfully able to put the sins of MacOS 9 behind us, those of us who use MacOS X are happy in our daily lives. The one fly in our secure email ointment was the near complete lack of support for S/MIME on the Macintosh platform. This drove us to universally adopt PGP as the corporate standard for secure email. While converting from Linux and Microsoft based operating systems, we evaluated four email clients. Our evaluation decision was strongly weighted by security issues and PGP integration was a large factor in the eventual decision. The rest of this article describes our experiences.
Three of the four contenders are household names: Apple Mail.app, Microsoft Entourage, and Eudora. A fourth, relatively unknown client was evaluated because a) they mentioned PGP support in the press release announcing the product, and b) we always like to give the underdog a fair shake. The fourth contender is MailSmith from Bare Bones Software. We should also mention that before the final email migration, we all dutifully upgraded to MacOS X 1.2 (Jaguar) and installed the latest version of PGP Version 8.0. Loaded with the latest and greatest version of MacOS X and PGP, here are our experiences.
- Eudora
The first package we will describe is Eudora. This mail package from Qualcomm is the old-faithful for many Mac and PC users. Before there was a stable version of Outlook, there was Eudora. The version we evaluated was 5.2.1 for MacOS X. After a breezy install, and a very good job of picking up email defaults from our MacOS 9 partition, we were ready to evaluate it based on it's PGP integration. We looked all over for information about using PGP with Eudora. We clicked on menu items and scoured the preferences panel. We even read the manual. Nowhere could we find any reference to PGP. A subsequent internet search revealed a set of AppleScripts to support the MacOS X port of GPG. While we are fans of GPG, our support rarely extends to actually using it. We had bought PGP for the express purpose of using a commercially supported product. We wish the GPG project all the best luck in the future, but for now we want to stick with PGP.
For our purposes, Eudora was simply a no-go. However, we really respect the product, and it should be pointed out that it is still possible to use PGP with Eudora, but you have to do this via the PGP submenu in the Services menu. So, if you are currently using Eudora and want to use PGP, it is certainly possible. To use it, however, you must first hilight your message, Navigate to the Eudora -> Services -> PGP menu. If you send three or four encrypted or digitally signed emails per week, using the Services menu is probably not a big deal. We send a lot more encrypted email than that, however, so integration and ease of use is a big deal for us.- Mail.app
The next package we evaluated was what we originally described as "the little Mail application that could." We are of course talking about the default Mail.app that comes with MacOS 10.2. Some of us in the Cryptonomicon.Net offices are old NeXT-hackers and were familiar with this latest incarnation of NeXTMail. We were happy to see that this version did not ship with a high-pitched cry for help disguised as a welcome message from Steve Jobs. When you pay for PGP, you get plugins for Mail.app and Entourage. We had high hopes, believing that if there was a plug-in, then hopefully the integration would be better than that demonstrated by Eudora. We were not disappointed. When you have the commercial version of PGP, integration with Mail.app is a snap. We selected the "sign messages by default" option and were digitally signing messages with little trouble. The integration was so nice that debates about the product centered on issues such as how long one should cache one's private key passphrase rather than any substantive issue with the product itself. In other words, PGP melted into the application. The only issue we had with the PGP plugin for Mail.app were the keyboard accelerators. The accelerator for digitally signing a message is "Command-Option-Shift-S," encrypting is "Command-Option-Shift-E," and decrypting / verifying is "Command-Option-Shift-D." We are concerned that if the keyboard accelerators for PGP functions become any more obscure, we will be using two hands a foot and a nose to press all the keys needed to access these functions. On the other hand, they are at least easy to remember: S for "Sign", E for "Encrypt", and D for "Decrypt / Verify."
All in all, we found the PGP integration with Mail.app to be a pleasant experience. However, we shudder to think what the experience without the plugins would be like.- MailSmith
Next in line for evaluation was MailSmith from Bare Bones Software. I must admit to not being too familiar with previous versions of this product. The only Bare Bones product I had been familiar with was BBEdit, their HTML and text editor. I had reasonably good experiences with BBEdit and the press release announcing the release of MailSmith did mention PGP, so I was looking forward to evaluating the product. We like the fact that secure email is becoming a more important feature in the minds of product managers, so we wanted to encourage them by at least looking at the product.
We were mildly disappointed. We weren't as disappointed with MailSmith as we were with Eudora, but there was still a tiny kernel of disappointment. While you can specify encryption or digital signatures on outgoing messages, there is a glitch in the product when you receive an encrypted email. There is no way to tell MailSmith to decrypt an encrypted email message. This meant we were back to using the PGP submenu under the Services menu. This is okay for casual PGP users, but at Cryptonomicon.Net, we're unnecessarily paranoid and encrypt just about everything, even our plans to decimate other teams in our bowling league. One interesting feature of this glitch is that when you receive a signed and encrypted email, the program tries to tell you that there was no valid signature attached to the message.
MailSmith has a number of other features we liked however. There seems to be advanced support for SPAM killing, and a number of tweaks to the mail editor that the Bare Bones team obviously took from BBEdit. We like MailSmith, but the lack of a message decryption interface was a deal-killer for us. However... we are definitely going to review the next couple of versions of MailSmith in hopes that they fix the problem. Also, if you receive a large volume of signed mail and a trickle of encrypted mail, then you might want to look at MailSmith.- Entourage
Finally we come to the juggernaut; the killer from Redmond, the 600 pound gorilla of email solutions for Macintosh: Microsoft Entourage. Let me say a few words about Entourage first. Entourage is everything that Outlook should be. I rarely crashes, it can hold a prodigious amount of email, and it supports synchronization with Palm devices. This is the product that got me to forgive Microsoft from developing such horrors as Outlook, Outlook Express, and Windows 3.0. I saw Entourage working on a friend's machine and I went out the same day and paid full price for the product. Truth be told, I actually like Entourage.
However, our criteria was based on PGP integration, an area where we expected Entourage to have problems. To our surprise and delight, the only problem Entourage seems to have is with PGP/MIME messages. We might also add that we believe that the placement of the PGP functions in the menu hierarchy is a little lame, but that's such a tiny issue when compared to the things that it does right. Assuming that you are not receiving mail from people using PGP/MIME (I am told that GPG does this,) Entourage has the best integration. We are especially pleased to see that messages can be decrypted or verified from the "consolidated view." That is to say, you don't need to double click on a message to open it in a separate window before applying the PGP magic. Another nice feature is that when replying to a decrypted message, the Entourage PGP plugin places the decrypted text in the outgoing reply. For many years, the default behavior for mail clients was to insert the encrypted and encoded lines of gibberish.- Conclusion
In conclusion, we have to say it's a close tie between Microsoft's Entourage and Apple's Mail.app. We are somewhat suspicious of being able to migrate away from Entourage, and we are concerned about the seemingly capricious nature of the empire from Redmond. If it was clearly in their best interest to discontinue Entourage, they certainly would. If this were to happen, we believe it might be difficult to migrate our messages and contacts from Entourage into whatever next-generation solution we adopt. It certainly was a nightmare moving from Outlook to Entourage.
Mail.app seemed to handle PGP/MIME with no problems. We were in the middle of discussions about how serious a problem PGP/MIME support (or lack thereof) was, when we received a couple of PGP/MIME formatted messages. Comparing the simple process of decrypting PGP/MIME formatted messages with the torturous nature of the same task with Entourage, we reluctantly admitted that PGP/MIME support was important, and that the Entourage plugin was not up to the task. There is a semi-major irritation with Mail.app, however. When replying to decrypted messages, Mail.app "does the wrong thing." Instead of creating a new reply with the decrypted message, it inserts the encrypted and encoded version. To avoid this problem, one must double-click on the message in the master view and THEN reply.
We eventually settled on Mail.app as our office standard. The issue involving improper behavior when replying to decrypted messages is minor when compared to Entourage's lack of support for PGP/MIME. The problem can successfully be worked around, even if it leaves us grumbling. Cost is also an issue; Mail.app is a standard feature in MacOS X while Entourage costs money. In the future we will be watching for developments from the MailSmith team. We'll also be looking for PGP/MIME support for Entourage.

